Rightjab

The Taliban have kidnapped 25 police recruits but I’m sure they are safe and being held in luxury accommodation.
If not, the Islamic high council of Australia will be outraged. Human rights being so important to them.

TALIBAN militants kidnapped 25 police recruits while they were travelling to a training centre in northwestern Pakistan, said a senior police official.

Just blow Gore

SUSPECTED Taliban militants arrested by Australian special forces in Afghanistan have been detained in “dog pens” in actions that have left Australian Muslim groups outraged and prompted a protest from the Afghan ambassador in Canberra, The Australian reports.

Australian Muslim groups are outraged. Diddums. It’s called war. So they spent the night in a dog pen. Big deal. At least they woke up in the morning with their heads still attached to their bodies.
It’s not as though these animals are used to soft mattresses and feather pillows. It might have even been a nice change to their caves.
Anyone might be mistaken in thinking that Muslim groups are outraged that Muslims have been treated this way by dirty kafirs.

Australia’s peak Muslim body, the Islamic High Council, expressed alarm at the practice.

“This is of concern to us whether they are Muslim or other people being confined in accommodation designed for dogs,” said council spokesman Mohamed Mehio. “This is a matter of human rights.”

What’s concerning is that the Islamic council of Australia is outraged over the treatment of Taliban militants instead of congratulating Australian soldiers on a job well done. Kind of makes you wonder where their loyalties lie.
I had no idea that the Islamic council were such strong human rights advocates. I’m sorry I must have missed the reports about the Islamic High Council’s outrage over these human rights violations.

.Taliban murders 2 women

Good job Aussie soldiers. Well done!!!

.

This is depressing;

Showing courtesy to Muslim employees, a local council in east London is urging non-Muslim members not to eat or drink during meetings with Muslim colleagues during the holy fasting month of Ramadan, reported the Daily Mail on Friday, August 29.

“It is requested that members do not partake of any refreshments until after the iftar (fast breaking) refreshments are served,” John Williams, head of Tower Hamlets Council’s democratic services, said in an e-mail to non-Muslim council members.

The order is part of special arrangements made by the council for the holy dawn-to-dusk fasting month.

The arrangements also include giving Muslim employees a 45-minute break during evening meetings to allow them break their fast and perform prayers.

Muslim members would also be offered iftar packs including tea, coffee, sandwiches and special Muslim snacks at the time of iftar.

The council’s agenda has also been reduced during Ramadan to include only seven committee meetings all over the month.

Good Dhimmies. But obviously you Dhimmies are not trying hard enough. What other explanation could there be for this;

In a large balcony above the beautiful main hall at Regent’s Park Mosque in London - widely considered the most important mosque in Britain - I am filming undercover as the woman preacher gives her talk.

Adulterers, she says, are to be stoned to death - and as for homosexuals, and women who “make themselves like a man, a woman like a man … the punishment is kill, kill them, throw them from the highest place“.

These punishments, the preacher says, are to be implemented in a future Islamic state. “This is not to tell you to start killing people,” she continues. “There must be a Muslim leader, when the Muslim army becomes stronger, when Islam has grown enough.”

A young female student from the group interrupts her: the punishment should also be to stone the homosexuals to death, once they have been thrown from a high place.

These are teachings I never expected to hear inside Regent’s Park Mosque, which is supposedly committed to interfaith dialogue and moderation, and was set up more than 60 years ago, to represent British Muslims to the Government. And many of those listening were teenage British girls or, even more disturbingly, young children.

Come on stupid Dhimmies. It must be your fault. You’re not trying hard enough.

Obama must be fuming. The media attention has turned to the new Republican candidate for Vice President. The Democratic convention is yesterdays news.
John McCain has announced Sarah Palin, Governor of Alaska, as his Vice Presidential running mate.
I think this is a brilliant move by McCain.
Palin is 44, three years younger than Obama. She brings youth to the Republicans and the impression of someone who’s real, not just another typical politician.
There’s talk she could pick up votes from disillusioned Hillary lovers. Apparently there are people out there, who vote for someone based entirely on the persons gender. How ridiculous! It’s like being say, black and voting for someone simply because they are black [or half black!] It’s unbelievably stupid and shallow.
Palin hunts and fishes and will appeal to the rural and blue collar vote. The Obama camp have already attacked her for being a small town mayor of 9000. Potentially offending small town America and coming across as bunch of elitist snobs.
Even though she’s somewhat inexperienced, she still has more experience than Obama. She has run a state, what’s Obama run? Any criticism of her inexperience will just highlight even more strongly Obama’s lack of experience, and he’s running for President not Vice President.
One thing I really like is that she’s a manmade global warming skeptic.
She supports drilling in ANWR
Palin is anti abortion, and on finding out her child was going to be born with Downs syndrome, she went ahead with the pregnancy. I’m not anti abortion, I don’t have strong opinions one way or the other, but I admire her for having the courage of her convictions. She doesn’t just talk the talk, she walks the walk.
Compare that to Obama. He can talk the talk but he’s full of shit! What sort of man has the audacity to utter the words Í am my brothers keeper’knowing that his brother George Hussein Anyango Obama survives on $12 a year and lives in a hut in a slum in Nairobi.
Admittedly my opinion is based on just what I’ve read about her this morning but so far I like her. She’s conservative and tough and seems to be a person of integrity and substance.
Update
Gotta love this;

Barack Obama’s campaign is blasting John McCain for putting “the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency.”
The McCain campaign gleefully pounced in their response:

It is pretty audacious for the Obama campaign to say that Governor Palin is not qualified to be Vice President. She has a record of accomplishment that Senator Obama simply cannot match. Governor Palin has spent her time in office shaking up government in Alaska and actually achieving results — whether it’s taking on corruption, passing ethics reform or stopping wasteful spending and the “bridge to nowhere.” Senator Obama has spent his time in office running for President.

Before the speech

BARACK Obama is preparing to make a crucial address to a huge audience in an echo of Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech.

Forty-five years to the day after the civil rights icon spelled out an electrifying vision of racial equality, Obama will claim his prize as the first-ever black presidential nominee of a major US political party.

On that day, Luther-King spoke the spine-tingling words that still remain one of the greatest speeches of all time:

“I have a dream that one day, this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal,’ ” he said forty years ago.

Yeah there’s just one thing. Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican
Why is this never mentioned? It’s almost like the Democrats and the media are trying to rewrite history. Or something.

To read more about why Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican go here

Obama limbered up his big day with a game of pickup basketball at a Denver gym, following his tradition of shooting hoops on red letter political days.

Later, he dropped in on a lunch of women from his Illinois delegation, telling them he had not forgotten his roots.

“I have a speech tonight. I wanted to practice it out on you guys,” Obama said, as the women cheered. “See if it works.”

Oh Puleeze!!!

Already running the most presumptuous campaign for President ever, complete with a chair on his private airplane labeled “President,” Republicans assumed Obama, due to his Messiah Complex, was going to announce in front of a Greek temple.

As the stage was finalized, it has become very clear it is not a Greek temple. It is the White House.

Update;
For a blow by blow description of the Messiah’s speech, go here

Update;

As Obama was speaking of “the promise of America” and referencing a “fundamental belief,” he uttered a line that should strike everyone as a really funny thing for him to say: “I am my brother’s keeper.”

He actually said that — and none of them laughed.

This man whose income last year exceeded $4 million and whose passion is to lecture the rest of us about compassion and helping the poor has a half-brother named George Hussein Anyango Obama who is living in a dilapidated hut in a slum on the outskirts of Nairobi on less than twelve dollars a year. He receives no help from brother Barack. Obama’s parting with some of his own change is not change his brother can depend on.

Yet he stands before thousand in a stadium, addressing millions on television. and he says: “I am my brother’s keeper.”

Maybe it’s just my warped sense of humour but …
bwahahahaha

AN elderly woman misunderstood instructions while checking in at Sweden’s main airport and was whisked down a baggage chute after she placed herself instead of her luggage on the belt.

The 78-year-old woman was preparing to fly from Stockholm’s Arlanda airport to Germany yesterday when she lay down on an unmanned baggage belt in the belief she was following check-in instructions, the Upsala Nya Tidning local daily reported on its website today.

She was quickly swept off to the baggage handling centre, where staff members helped get her back on her feet.

The woman suffered no serious injuries and caught her flight as planned.

A school in Townsville has banned cartwheels and handstands because it has deemed them to be too dangerous. The school claims it is protecting the students from injury.
I agree with this decision! In fact all physical activity should be banned. From now on children should file out to the playground in an orderly manner. line up, sit down, eat their lunch, stand up, file back into the classroom and continue their lessons.
On second thought they should not be made to walk out to the playground because they could trip over and be injured. The teachers should wheel them out to the playground.
Then again, they should not go out to the playground at all. Anything could happen outdoors. Way too dangerous. Keep them inside.
Lunch is also potentially hazardous. They could choke! All their food should be placed in a blender and consumed through a straw.
Paper should be banned. Paper cuts are very painful.
Girls hair ties. Ban them. If one of them flew across the room, why, someone could lose an eye!
Who would have thought school could be such a dangerous place.
Ban schools!
I think I might buy some shares in a company that manufactures cotton wool.
The following is from an email thats been going around for years;

According to today’s regulators and educrats, those of us who
were kids in the 60’s, 70’s and early 80’s probably shouldn’t have survived, because:
Our baby cots were covered with brightly coloured lead-based paint which was promptly chewed and licked. We had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, or latches on doors or cabinets and it was fine to play with pans.
When we rode our bikes, we wore no helmets, just thongs and fluorescent ‘clackers’ on our wheels.
As children, we would ride in cars with no seat belts or airbags riding in the passenger seat was a treat.
We drank water from the garden hose and not from a bottle and it tasted the same.
We ate chips, bread and butter pudding and drank fizzy pop with sugar in it, but we were never overweight because we were always outside playing.
We shared one drink with four friends, from one bottle or can and no-one actually died from this.
We would spend hours building go-carts out of scraps and then went top speed down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. After running into stinging nettles a few times, we learned to solve the problem.
We would leave home in the morning and could play all day, as long as we were back before it got dark. No one was able to reach us and no one minded.
We did not have Play stations or X-Boxes, no video games at all. No 99 channels on TV, no videotape movies, no surround sound, no mobile phones, no personal computers, no Internet chat rooms. We had friends we went outside and found them.
We played elastics and street rounders, and sometimes that ball really hurt.
We fell out of trees, got cut and broke bones but there were no lawsuits.
We had full on fist fights but no prosecution followed from other parents.
We played knock-down-ginger and were afraid of the owners catching us.
We walked to friend’s homes.
We also, believe it or not, WALKED to school; we didn’t rely on mummy or daddy to drive us to school, which was just round the corner.
We made up games with sticks and tennis balls.
We rode bikes in packs of 7 and wore our coats by only the hood.
The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke a law was unheard of. They actually sided with the law.This generation has produced some of the best risk-takers and
problem solvers and inventors, ever. The past 50 years have been an explosion of innovation and new ideas.

We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned how to deal with it all.

And you’re one of them. Congratulations!

Former Texas Rep. Charlie Wilson — yes, that Charlie Wilson — was speaking at an anti-war rally when he, um, flubbed a line:

“We should be led by Osama bin Laden,” he said, then quickly corrected himself. “I mean Obama and Biden.”

Meanwhile over at the Democratic convention in Denver, Biden is proving himself to be a formidable opponent for the Republicans.

In three sets of unscripted and sometimes rambling remarks Tuesday, Biden thanked God that one of his audiences was overwhelmingly female, called Michelle Obama’s convention speech “the most remarkable speech I have heard in my life” and predicted it would propel him and running mate Barack Obama to victory in the fall.

He also said he didn’t care about the press, that Obama has a “sixth sense” and Delaware Gov. Ruth Ann Minner has “the most incredible story in American politics,” that he and Barack Obama had “the most incredible opportunity … since Franklin Roosevelt.” And he choked up a handful of times, once wiping away tears after proclaiming that having a chance to be vice president pales in comparison to representing Delaware in the Senate.

Yep, those Republicans must have been devastated to hear Obama had chosen Biden as his running mate.
Biden himself must be relieved to have been chosen by a ‘black man’ who is, to use his own words, “articulate and bright and clean” and most importantly, not Indian, [ “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking.”]
Former president Bill Clinton also had a few words to say;

Bill Clinton appeared to undermine Sen. Barack Obama again Tuesday.

The former president, speaking in Denver, posed a hypothetical question in which he seemed to suggest that that the Democratic Party was making a mistake in choosing Obama as its presidential nominee.

He said: “Suppose you’re a voter, and you’ve got candidate X and candidate Y. Candidate X agrees with you on everything, but you don’t think that candidate can deliver on anything at all. Candidate Y you agree with on about half the issues, but he can deliver. Which candidate are you going to vote for?”

Then, perhaps mindful of how his off-the-cuff remarks might be taken, Clinton added after a pause: “This has nothing to do with what’s going on now.”

And Obama proved once again that he is prepared to exploit his own children, to achieve his dream of being president.

I was curious about the psychology behind a group whose hatred of females is so intense that they slaughtered female goats whose tails pointed upwards, because their private parts were exposed.
Who even see fruit and vegetables as male and female, and ban women from buying male vegetables.
This explains a lot;

Just recently, the Taliban issued a new set of 30 rules to its fighters.

Many of the instructions were to be expected: rule No. 25 commands the murder of teachers if a warning and a beating does not dissuade them from teaching. No. 26 outlines the exquisite delicacy of burning schools and destroying anything that aid organizations might undertake — such as the building of a new road, school or clinic. The essence of the other rules are easily left to the imagination, basically involving what militant Islam is about: vile hate, death and destruction.

But there is a curious rule that the Western media has typically ignored. Rule No. 19 instructs that Taliban fighters must not take young boys without facial hair into their private quarters.

Right.

(Cough and clearing of the throat).

Aside from the question of what is permitted if a young boy does happen to have facial hair, this new Taliban commandment brings light to a taboo pathology that underlies the structures of militant Islam. And it is crucial to deconstruct the meaning of this rule — and the horrid reality that it represents — because it serves as a gateway to understanding the primary causes of Islamic rage and terror.

Rule No. 19 obviously indicates that the sexual abuse of young boys is a prevalent and institutionalized phenomenon among the Taliban and that, for one reason or another, its widespread practice has become a problem.

The fact that Taliban militants’ spare time involves sodomizing young boys should by no means be any kind of surprise or eyebrow raiser. That a mass pathology such as this occurs in a culture which demonizes the female and her sexuality — and puts her out of mind and sight — is only to be expected. To be sure, it is a simple given that the religious male fanatic who flies into a violent rage even at the thought of an exposed woman’s ankle will also be, in some other dysfunctional and dark secret compartment of his fractured life, the person who leads some poor helpless young boy into his private chambers.

The key issue here is that the demented sickness that underlies Rule No. 19 is by no means exclusive to the Taliban; it is a widespread phenomenon throughout Islamic-Arab culture and it lies, among other factors, at the root of that culture’s addiction to rage and its lust for violence, terror and suicide.

There is a basic and common sense empirical human reality: wherever humans construct and perpetuate an environment in which females and their sexuality are demonized and are pushed into invisibility, homosexual behaviour among men and the sexual abuse of young boys by older men always increases. Islamic-Arab culture serves as a perfect example of this paradigm, seeing that gender apartheid, fear of female sexuality and a vicious misogyny are the structures on which the whole society functions.

It is no surprise that John Racy, a psychiatrist with much experience in Arab societies, has noted that homosexuality is “extremely common” in many parts of the Arab world. [1] Indeed, even though homosexuality is officially despised in this culture and strictly prohibited and punishable by imprisonment, incarceration and/or death, having sex with boys or effeminate men is actually a social norm. Males serve as available substitutes for unavailable women. The key is this: the male who does the penetrating is not considered to be homosexual or emasculated any more than if he were to have sex with his wife, while the male who is penetrated is emasculated. The boy, however, is not considered to be emasculated since he is not yet considered to be a man. A man who has sex with boys is simply doing what many men (especially unmarried ones) do. [2] And this reality is connected to the fact that, as scholar Bruce Dunne has demonstrated, sex in Islamic-Arab societies is not about mutuality between partners, but about the adult male’s achievement of pleasure through violent domination. [3]

While secrecy and taboo surround this phenomenon, some courageous Arabs have dared to discuss and expose it. Walid Shoebat, for instance, a former Palestinian terrorist, has openly related the abuse of young boys in Palestinian Muslim society. He himself witnessed a line of shepherd boys waiting for their turn to sodomize a five-year-old boy. [4] Amnesty International has also reported that Afghan warlords routinely sexually victimize young boys and film the orgies. [5] (The sexual abuse of young girls in this environment is also obviously widespread). [6]

Read the rest here